Tuesday, June 11, 2019
Do you think that Mr. Champlin should have consulted with the Navy Essay
Do you think that Mr. Champlin should have consulted with the Navy before spending his time and bullion on this project - Essay ExampleNavy irrespective of whether they were lost or considered abandoned in U.S., foreign or foreign waters. These guidelines are ground on the US Constitutional and international maritime laws and the ownership is consistent with Articles 95 and 96 of the Laws of the Sea Convention. These articles delineate the terms of immunity of warships in international waters. Additionally, the statutes as they stand with regards to federal property dictate that all lost or presumed abandoned ships and aircrafts should not be disturbed or removed without a formal application and approval of said application before the property is moved. Operating under this tenet, the actions of Mr. Champlin proved to be in violation of the law. Essentially, he was stupid of the law but this does not relive any responsibility for its compliance. I find it presumptuous of Mr. Cham plin to ask for a refund when he blatantly go against several statutes with regards to presumably abandoned governmental property.I feel that Mr. Champlin should make it his business to be appraised with regards to the special rules of federal property especially in barge of the fact that he intended to gain possession of it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.