The effects of power Essay Example for Free

The effects of world-beater tryThe power of pith and the focusing although different in record both affects the outcome of a negotiation. The power of the union is based on numbers whereas power exercised by trouble is power conferred upon it by the nature of the strain. In negotiations, on that point is always a point of equilibrium where both parties ar going to profit from the exchange and which is the virtually profit adapted point for both parties. However, this point of equilibrium shadower be manipulated into travel towards either side by the power the two parties possess. The effects of the power exercised management and the power exercised by the union during negotiations differ as to the situation or the environment, when the company is involved in a business that requires highly technical employees, the union will probably have a stronger bargaining power than the management especially since the workers are under short supply. In cases where the management is required to face-off with a union that is composed of low-skilled employees and the situs of the company is abundant on such resource, then management will be able to steer the negotiations towards the direction that is most favorable to it.Balancing of power Balancing of power can be equated as the power of both parties negating each other and thus ending in a allege of equilibrium wherein both parties have reached the best possible solution to their problems. Balancing of power can entirely be achieved if both parties assume that mutual gains are possible, and should non assume that one party must(prenominal) suffer for the other to benefit (McCarthy, 1991). Balancing of power is important because it is in this state that both parties are benefited without sacrificing too much of their demands. There are several ways to maintain this balance of power and stay its abuse. One tactic is to understand others interests, another is to analyze the sources of power available to a ll parties but not being paralyzed by it, another tactic is to consider other options making your position flexile thus reducing the risk of the other party easily influencing or manipulating you, and also, you must understand your personalized style, your own strengths and weaknesses to know what you are capable of and protect oneself from the other partys bluffs (Kochan, 2005).Power everywhere employment locating Power that is normally exercised by management is the power over the employment status of an employee. Although several state policies and internal company policies are aimed to prevent the abuse of this power when dealing with several(prenominal) workers, it is still commonplace that management easily manipulates the lowly worker into succumbing to its wishes under the pressures of losing his or her job. It is because of this power that there can be no effective communication in the midst of a worker and management in conflict situations. When entering into conflic t negotiations, the ideal state is that the parties are on equal footing, however, there can be no equality when the other party has control over your livelihood. Regardless of this power that management holds, the lowly worker can seek redress from the courts on grounds of equity. Courts knowing the imbalance between the two parties are more inclined to rule in favor of the lowly worker presumptuousness there is sufficient basis. Because of this fear of litigation and the prospect of losing more money in the long run, most companies are now shifting towards justice and fairness in conflict resolutions. As a progeny of fact, Eighty-three percent of corporate executives report the fear of a lawsuit affects their decisions (Hubert, 1998) and tend to do what is equitable.ReferencesHubert, Denise V.M. (1998). The prototypal Step in Alternative Dispute Resolution Fact-Finding. Retrieved January 27, 2008, from http//www.management-advantage.com/newsletr/jul98.htmKochan, Tom (2005). Neg otiations and Conflict Management Basic Concepts surmise and Practice. Retrieved January 27, 2008, from http//ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Sloan-School-of-Management/15-668Fall-2005/F06D4B27-6A22-4FDD-9449-B2664318C7C4/0/lecture_12.pdfMcCarthy, William (1991). The Role of Power and Principle in Getting to Yes. Retrieved January 27, 2008, from http//www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/problem/mcca7535.htm